2001 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 24V (200 Hp) 2001Overall Score68.5/100
2001 Ford Taurus vs 2001 Mitsubishi Challenger Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Mitsubishi
Challenger
Mitsubishi Challenger 3.0 i V6 24V (185 Hp) 2001Overall Score69.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Challenger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
FordMakeMitsubishi
TaurusModelChallenger
2001Model year2001
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
200 HPPower185 HP
271 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank74 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
215/60 R16Tyre size265/70 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford TaurusSpecificationMitsubishi Challenger
5019 mmLength4530 mm
1854 mmWidth1775 mm
1425 mmHeight1730 mm
1530 KgWeight1830 Kg
2756 mmWheelbase2725 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Ford Taurus and 2001 Mitsubishi Challenger approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…