DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2001 Renault Laguna Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
ChallengerModelLaguna
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,1 s
170 km/hTop speed235 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
185 HPPower207 HP
265 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14,9 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
265/70 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4576 mm
1775 mmWidth1772 mm
1730 mmHeight1429 mm
1830 KgWeight1505 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2740 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2001 Renault Laguna approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…