DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Mitsubishi Challenger vs 2001 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Challenger

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
ChallengerModelGalaxy
2001Model year2001
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
170 km/hTop speed217 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2792 cc
185 HPPower204 HP
265 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank70 lt
16 ltUrban consumption14,8 lt
10 ltExtra-urban consumption8,5 lt
—Average consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
265/70 R15Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4530 mmLength4641 mm
1775 mmWidth1810 mm
1730 mmHeight1732 mm
1830 KgWeight1700 Kg
2725 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Mitsubishi Challenger and 2001 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Challenger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…