DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2002 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
CarismaModelV40
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
265 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4516 mm
1710 mmWidth1716 mm
1405 mmHeight1425 mm
1265 KgWeight1260 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2562 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2002 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…