DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Opel Vectra vs 2002 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeMitsubishi
VectraModelCarisma
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
203 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
170 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4495 mmLength4475 mm
1707 mmWidth1710 mm
1425 mmHeight1405 mm
1265 KgWeight1265 Kg
2637 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Opel Vectra and 2002 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…