DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2002 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
CarismaModelVectra
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
195 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
115 HPPower115 HP
265 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4475 mmLength4495 mm
1710 mmWidth1707 mm
1405 mmHeight1425 mm
1265 KgWeight1265 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2637 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2002 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…