DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1995 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
CarismaModelClio
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
200 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
116 HPPower110 HP
162 NmTorque158 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength3709 mm
1710 mmWidth1616 mm
1405 mmHeight1395 mm
1130 KgWeight955 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1995 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…