1995 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.8 i 16V (115 Hp) 1995Overall Score56.25/100
1995 Ford Escort vs 1995 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.8 (116 Hp) 1995Overall Score55.5/100
WINNER
Ford Escort
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
FordMakeMitsubishi
EscortModelCarisma
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
196 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1834 cc
115 HPPower116 HP
160 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,4 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4293 mmLength4435 mm
1700 mmWidth1710 mm
1394 mmHeight1405 mm
1115 KgWeight1130 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Ford Escort and 1995 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Escort leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…