DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1995 MG MGF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG MGF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

55.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMG
CarismaModelMGF
1995Model year1995
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
200 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1834 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
116 HPPower120 HP
162 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/55 R15; 205/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength3920 mm
1710 mmWidth1630 mm
1405 mmHeight1260 mm
1130 KgWeight1060 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2375 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1995 MG MGF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG MGF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…