DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 2000 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 323

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMazda
CarismaModel323
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h11,6 s
185 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
99 HPPower98 HP
137 NmTorque145 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
—Average consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4290 mm
1710 mmWidth1705 mm
1405 mmHeight1420 mm
1105 KgWeight1070 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Mitsubishi Carisma and 2000 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…