2000 • Mazda
323
Mazda 323 1.6 i 16V (98 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Mazda 323 vs 1999 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.6 (99 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Mazda 323
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
MazdaMakeMitsubishi
323ModelCarisma
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
11,6 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
184 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
98 HPPower99 HP
145 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda 323SpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4290 mmLength4435 mm
1705 mmWidth1710 mm
1420 mmHeight1405 mm
1070 KgWeight1105 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Mazda 323 and 1999 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda 323 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…