1999 • Ford
Escort
Ford Escort 1.6 i 16V 4X4 (90 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Ford Escort vs 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Carisma
Mitsubishi Carisma 1.6 (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Carisma
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
FordMakeMitsubishi
EscortModelCarisma
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
12,9 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
175 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
134 NmTorque137 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14 HTyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford EscortSpecificationMitsubishi Carisma
4104 mmLength4435 mm
1691 mmWidth1710 mm
1398 mmHeight1405 mm
1165 KgWeight1080 Kg
2525 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Ford Escort and 2000 Mitsubishi Carisma approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…