DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma vs 1999 Ford Escort Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Carisma

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
CarismaModelEscort
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
180 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1597 ccEngine displacement1597 cc
90 HPPower90 HP
137 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption—
6,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/60 R14 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4435 mmLength4104 mm
1710 mmWidth1691 mm
1405 mmHeight1398 mm
1080 KgWeight1165 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2525 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi Carisma and 1999 Ford Escort approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Carisma leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…