2013 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V Hybrid (177 Hp) 2013Overall Score63.25/100
2013 Kia Optima vs 2013 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Mitsubishi
ASX
Mitsubishi ASX 2.2 DI-D (147 Hp) 2013Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
KiaMakeMitsubishi
OptimaModelASX
2013Model year2013
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
9,4 s0–100 km/h10,8 s
190 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2268 cc
150 HPPower147 HP
180 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,1 lt
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
4845 mmLength4295 mm
1830 mmWidth1770 mm
1455 mmHeight1615 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight1520 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Kia Optima and 2013 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…