DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Volvo XC90 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolvo
ASXModelXC90
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
147 HPPower163 HP
360 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank68 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17 96HTyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4807 mm
1770 mmWidth1936 mm
1615 mmHeight1784 mm
1520 KgWeight2139 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2857 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Volvo XC90 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…