DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSuzuki
ASXModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
147 HPPower169 HP
360 NmTorque227 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank66 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R17 96HTyre size225/65 R17 101H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4500 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1615 mmHeight1695 mm
1520 KgWeight1644 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…