DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Suzuki Grand Vitara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSuzuki
ASXModelGrand Vitara
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2268 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
147 HPPower166 HP
360 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,1 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
5,8 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/60 R17 96HTyre size225/70 R16 102S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4060 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1615 mmHeight1695 mm
1520 KgWeight1521 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2440 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Suzuki Grand Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…