DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Volkswagen Scirocco Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
ASXModelScirocco
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,4 s
194 km/hTop speed227 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
150 HPPower180 HP
197 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size205/50 R17; 225/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4256 mm
1770 mmWidth1810 mm
1625 mmHeight1406 mm
1360 KgWeight1346 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Volkswagen Scirocco approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…