DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–71.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
CX-3ModelASX
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h—
200 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
204 NmTorque197 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
44 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4295 mm
1765 mmWidth1770 mm
1535 mmHeight1625 mm
1235 KgWeight1360 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…