DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
ASXModelCaddy
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeMinivan, Kombi
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
194 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
197 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4878 mm
1770 mmWidth1793 mm
1625 mmHeight1831 mm
1360 KgWeight1600 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase3006 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…