DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Seat Ateca Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.25–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSeat
ASXModelAteca
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,3 s
194 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
197 NmTorque340 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,7 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size225/55 R17 97V; 225/50 R18 95W; 225/45 R19 92
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4363 mm
1770 mmWidth1841 mm
1625 mmHeight1601 mm
1360 KgWeight1473 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2638-2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Seat Ateca approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…