DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Volkswagen Caddy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeVolkswagen
ASXModelCaddy
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
186 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1968 cc
140 HPPower140 HP
177 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,6 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
CVTGears6
215/65 R16; 215/60 R17Tyre size195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 205/50 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4406 mm
1770 mmWidth1794 mm
1625 mmHeight1823 mm
1390 KgWeight1425 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2681 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Volkswagen Caddy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…