DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMitsubishi
CountrymanModelASX
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,3 s0–100 km/h—
198 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
143 HPPower140 HP
305 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption7,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6GearsCVT
205/55 R17 91V RSCTyre size215/65 R16; 215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4110 mmLength4295 mm
1789 mmWidth1770 mm
1561 mmHeight1625 mm
1320 KgWeight1390 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…