DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2012 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Kuga

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 11.25 points.

57.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
ASXModelKuga
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,4 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
183 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
117 HPPower163 HP
154 NmTorque340 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
63 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
—Tyre size235/55 R17; 235/50 R18; 235/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4524 mm
1770 mmWidth1838 mm
1615 mmHeight1701 mm
1260 KgWeight1692 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2690 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mitsubishi ASX and 2012 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Kuga leads the E-Kıyasla score by 11.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…