DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Volvo S60 vs 2012 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolvoMakeMitsubishi
S60ModelASX
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h11,4 s
0 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1590 cc
115 HPPower117 HP
270 NmTorque154 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
67 ltFuel tank63 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
4,3 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4628 mmLength4295 mm
1865 mmWidth1770 mm
1484 mmHeight1615 mm
1488 KgWeight1260 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Volvo S60 and 2012 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…