DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek vs 2004 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMG
AirtrekModelZS
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
126 HPPower113 HP
173 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4410 mmLength4520 mm
1750 mmWidth1700 mm
1550 mmHeight1390 mm
1330 KgWeight1225 Kg
2626 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mitsubishi Airtrek and 2004 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…