DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi 3000 GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

74.5–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMercedes-Benz
3000 GTModelML
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
230 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3199 cc
222 HPPower218 HP
273 NmTorque310 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank83 lt
15 ltUrban consumption18,2 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption11,2 lt
—Average consumption13,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
225/55 R16Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4565 mmLength4587 mm
1840 mmWidth1833 mm
1247 mmHeight1820 mm
1450 KgWeight1990 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT and 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi 3000 GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…