DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT vs 1999 Mitsubishi 3000 GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi 3000 GT

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeMitsubishi
3000 GTModel3000 GT
2000Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeCabriolet
2+2Seats2+2
2Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
320 HPPower320 HP
427 NmTorque427 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
245/45 R17Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4565 mmLength4565 mm
1840 mmWidth1840 mm
1290 mmHeight1290 mm
1725 KgWeight1725 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT and 1999 Mitsubishi 3000 GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi 3000 GT leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…