DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Alpina B10 vs 2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AlpinaMakeMitsubishi
B10Model3000 GT
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

6,3 s0–100 km/h—
262 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3300 ccEngine displacement2972 cc
280 HPPower320 HP
335 NmTorque427 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank75 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,1 ltAverage consumption11,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18Tyre size245/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4775 mmLength4565 mm
1800 mmWidth1840 mm
1415 mmHeight1290 mm
1540 KgWeight1725 Kg
2830 mmWheelbase2470 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Alpina B10 and 2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…