DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT vs 2000 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeAlpina
3000 GTModelB3
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,7 s
0 km/hTop speed266 km/h
2972 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
320 HPPower280 HP
427 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,7 lt
11,5 ltAverage consumption10,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
245/45 R17Tyre size225/40 ZR18; 255/35 ZR18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4565 mmLength4471 mm
1840 mmWidth1739 mm
1290 mmHeight1395 mm
1725 KgWeight1450 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2725 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mitsubishi 3000 GT and 2000 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…