DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Paceman vs 2016 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMazda
PacemanModelCX-3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
202 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque204 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank44 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
205/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4114 mmLength4275 mm
1786 mmWidth1765 mm
1518 mmHeight1535 mm
1320 KgWeight1235 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2570 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Paceman and 2016 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…