DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Mini Paceman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMini
CX-3ModelPaceman
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
200 km/hTop speed202 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
204 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4114 mm
1765 mmWidth1786 mm
1535 mmHeight1518 mm
1235 KgWeight1320 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Mini Paceman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…