2013 • Mini
Paceman
Mini Paceman 1.6 (218 Hp) 2013Overall Score71.5/100
2013 Mini Paceman vs 2013 Volvo V70 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Volvo
V70
Volvo V70 1.6 T4 (180 Hp) 2013Overall Score70.75/100
WINNER
Mini Paceman
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mini PacemanSpecificationVolvo V70
MiniMakeVolvo
PacemanModelV70
2013Model year2013
CoupeBody typeEstate
4Seats5
3Doors5
Performance
Mini PacemanSpecificationVolvo V70
6,9 s0–100 km/h8,7 s
226 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
218 HPPower180 HP
280 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mini PacemanSpecificationVolvo V70
PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank70 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,4 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mini PacemanSpecificationVolvo V70
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18 91VTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Mini PacemanSpecificationVolvo V70
4124 mmLength4823 mm
1786 mmWidth—
1527 mmHeight1547 mm
1400 KgWeight1567 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2816 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2013 Mini Paceman and 2013 Volvo V70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mini Paceman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…