DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Mini Hatch vs 2014 FAW Besturn X80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFAW
HatchModelBesturn X80
2014Model year2014
HatchbackBody typeSUV
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

6,5 s0–100 km/h—
238 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
211 HPPower180 HP
260 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank58 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/45 R17 84W RSCTyre size215/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3714 mmLength4586 mm
1683 mmWidth1820 mm
1407 mmHeight1695 mm
1130 KgWeight1610 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Mini Hatch and 2014 FAW Besturn X80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…