DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 FAW Besturn X80 vs 2014 Mini Hatch Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

FAW Besturn X80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

72.25–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FAWMakeMini
Besturn X80ModelHatch
2014Model year2014
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,5 s
198 km/hTop speed238 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
180 HPPower211 HP
235 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,8 lt
—Average consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R17Tyre size205/45 R17 84W RSC
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4586 mmLength3714 mm
1820 mmWidth1683 mm
1695 mmHeight1407 mm
1610 KgWeight1130 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 FAW Besturn X80 and 2014 Mini Hatch approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, FAW Besturn X80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…