DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Hatch vs 2012 Fiat Bravo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFiat
HatchModelBravo
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
195 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower120 HP
240 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
40 ltFuel tank57 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
3,9 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R15 84HTyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3709 mmLength4336 mm
1683 mmWidth1792 mm
1407 mmHeight1498 mm
1090 KgWeight1320 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Hatch and 2012 Fiat Bravo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…