DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Fiat Bravo vs 2012 Mini Hatch Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FiatMakeMini
BravoModelHatch
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
195 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
120 HPPower110 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
57 ltFuel tank40 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption4,7 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption3,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/55 R16Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4336 mmLength3709 mm
1792 mmWidth1683 mm
1498 mmHeight1407 mm
1320 KgWeight1090 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Fiat Bravo and 2012 Mini Hatch approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…