DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mini Hatch vs 2017 Mazda CX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeMazda
HatchModelCX-3
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
203 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
116 HPPower105 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank48 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R15 84HTyre size18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3982 mmLength4275 mm
1727 mmWidth1765 mm
1425 mmHeight1535 mm
1190 KgWeight1200 kg
—Luggage capacity350 lt
2567 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mini Hatch

No additional feature records are available.

Mazda CX-3Driver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mini Hatch and 2017 Mazda CX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…