DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Kuga vs 2017 Mini Hatch Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford KugaSpecificationMini Hatch
FordMakeMini
KugaModelHatch
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford KugaSpecificationMini Hatch
12,7 s0–100 km/h9,4 s
173 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
120 HPPower116 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

Ford KugaSpecificationMini Hatch
DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank44 lt
4,8 ltUrban consumption4,4 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,2 lt
4,5 ltAverage consumption3,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford KugaSpecificationMini Hatch
4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
ManualTransmission—
17Tyre size175/65 R15 84H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford KugaSpecificationMini Hatch
4524 mmLength3982 mm
1911 mmWidth1727 mm
1701 mmHeight1425 mm
1591 kgWeight1190 Kg
406 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2567 mm

Additional Features

Ford KugaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth
Mini Hatch

No additional feature records are available.

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Kuga and 2017 Mini Hatch approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…