DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mini Hatch vs 2017 Ford Kuga Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Hatch

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.5–67.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
MiniMakeFord
HatchModelKuga
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
9,4 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
203 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
116 HPPower120 HP
270 NmTorque270 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
DieselFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank60 lt
4,4 ltUrban consumption4,8 lt
3,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
3,6 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x2
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
175/65 R15 84HTyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mini HatchSpecificationFord Kuga
3982 mmLength4524 mm
1727 mmWidth1911 mm
1425 mmHeight1701 mm
1190 KgWeight1591 kg
—Luggage capacity406 lt
2567 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Mini Hatch

No additional feature records are available.

Ford KugaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRElectronic Parking BrakeHill Start AssistCruise ControlDriver Fatigue DetectionComing HomeLeaving HomeTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless Startstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsFront Parking SensorsRear Parking SensorsReversing CameraAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorLight SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mini Hatch and 2017 Ford Kuga approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Hatch leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…