DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Mini Coupe vs 2004 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeVolkswagen
CoupeModelPolo
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
165 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1390 cc
75 HPPower100 HP
180 NmTorque126 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
175/65 R15Tyre size215/40 R17 W
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3626 mmLength3911 mm
1688 mmWidth1671 mm
1408 mmHeight1537 mm
1175 KgWeight1106 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2462 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Mini Coupe and 2004 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…