DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Volkswagen Polo vs 2004 Mini Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Polo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

VolkswagenMakeMini
PoloModelCoupe
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

12,1 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
183 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1390 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
100 HPPower75 HP
126 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/40 R17 WTyre size175/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3911 mmLength3626 mm
1671 mmWidth1688 mm
1537 mmHeight1408 mm
1106 KgWeight1175 Kg
2462 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Volkswagen Polo and 2004 Mini Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…