DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mini Coupe vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mini CoupeSpecificationRover 25
MiniMakeRover
CoupeModel25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Mini CoupeSpecificationRover 25
13,5 s0–100 km/h10,2 s
165 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1364 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
75 HPPower103 HP
180 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mini CoupeSpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mini CoupeSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
175/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mini CoupeSpecificationRover 25
3626 mmLength3990 mm
1688 mmWidth1688 mm
1408 mmHeight1417 mm
1175 KgWeight1105 Kg
2467 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mini Coupe and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…