DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-3 vs 2016 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMini
CX-3ModelCountryman
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,7 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
200 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
150 HPPower143 HP
204 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
44 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R17 91V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4275 mmLength4109 mm
1765 mmWidth1789 mm
1535 mmHeight1561 mm
1235 KgWeight1320 Kg
2570 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-3 and 2016 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…