DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Mini Countryman vs 2010 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
CountrymanModelC-Max
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeMPV
4/5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
173 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
98 HPPower100 HP
153 NmTorque143 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4372 mm
1789 mmWidth1825 mm
1561 mmHeight1595 mm
1265 KgWeight1344 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Mini Countryman and 2010 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…