2010 • Ford
C-Max
Ford C-Max 1.6 16V (100 Hp) 2010Overall Score54.25/100
2010 Ford C-Max vs 2010 Mini Countryman Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2010 • Mini
Countryman
Mini Countryman 1.6 (98 Hp) 2010Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Ford C-Max
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Countryman
FordMakeMini
C-MaxModelCountryman
2010Model year2010
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
5Doors5
Performance
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Countryman
12,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
175 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1596 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
100 HPPower98 HP
143 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Countryman
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Countryman
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/60 R16 92H
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Ford C-MaxSpecificationMini Countryman
4372 mmLength4097 mm
1825 mmWidth1789 mm
1595 mmHeight1561 mm
1344 KgWeight1265 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Ford C-Max and 2010 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…