DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mini Countryman vs 2016 Ford KA Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
CountrymanModelKA
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
186 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
112 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / Ethanol – E85
47 ltFuel tank51 lt
4,7 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16 92HTyre size175/65 R14; 195/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4254 mm
1789 mmWidth1695 mm
1561 mmHeight1460 mm
1310 KgWeight1032 Kg
2596 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mini Countryman and 2016 Ford KA approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…