DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford KA vs 2016 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMini
KAModelCountryman
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed186 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
110 HPPower112 HP
146 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / Ethanol – E85Fuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption4,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14; 195/55 R15Tyre size205/60 R16 92H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4254 mmLength4097 mm
1695 mmWidth1789 mm
1460 mmHeight1561 mm
1032 KgWeight1310 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2596 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford KA and 2016 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…