DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mini Countryman vs 2017 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeFord
CountrymanModelFigo
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h—
190 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1496 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
116 HPPower112 HP
270 NmTorque136 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank42 lt
4,5 ltUrban consumption—
3,9 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4299 mmLength3995 mm
1822 mmWidth1695 mm
1557 mmHeight1525 mm
1310-1385 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mini Countryman and 2017 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…