DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Ford Figo vs 2017 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Countryman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeMini
FigoModelCountryman
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1496 cc
112 HPPower116 HP
136 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption4,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size205/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3995 mmLength4299 mm
1695 mmWidth1822 mm
1525 mmHeight1557 mm
—Weight1310-1385 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Ford Figo and 2017 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Countryman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…